Process
Ten Seconds Before Beats Ten Hours After
Catching a bad trade at the door instead of dissecting it afterwards. The three questions of a pre-trade check that actually gets used.
Almost all trading education points backwards: review the trade, journal it, learn from the mistake. All valuable β with one problem. The money is already gone.
Most bad trades can be caught by three questions asked before entry. Those three questions make more money than ten hours of post-trade analysis.
Why exactly three
Long checklists don't work. A twenty-item list never gets opened before entry, because the fear of missing the move beats the list. The only success criterion for a checklist is that it's actually used. So it has to be short.
Question 1: Is this setup in my plan?
The answer has to be yes or no, not "similar to." Is it a setup defined in your playbook, or something that just looks reasonable right now? The most consistent finding in trading journals is that unplanned trades have dramatically worse expectancy than planned ones.
This question also catches boredom trades. A trade taken out of boredom is never a planned setup.
Question 2: What proves me wrong, and what does that cost?
The stop level and the risk amount must exist before entry. If you can't answer this cleanly, you're not ready to enter β you have an idea, not a plan.
There's a second benefit: the moment you quantify the risk, position size resolves itself. Most oversized positions are oversized because nobody did the arithmetic β it's an omission, not a decision.
Question 3: Is my current state affecting this trade?
What happened on your last trade? If you lost, are you making it back? If you won, are you giving yourself extra permission? How many trades have you taken today? This is a behavioral check, not a technical one β and it's the one most often skipped.
Taking the same setup in a different mental state is running a different strategy.
All three take about ten seconds. Each time they stop a trade they save roughly 1R. Stop five a month and that's 60R a year β more than most traders make in a year.
How checklists stop working
- Too long β it never gets opened.
- Vague answers ("sort of," "close enough") β everything passes.
- Filled in after entry β that's not a check, that's a justification.
- "No" has no consequence β the list becomes decorative.
The last one matters most. A checklist is only a check if answering "no" actually cancels the trade. Otherwise it's paperwork.
What to do with the answers
The real payoff compounds. Record the answers alongside each trade and after a few months you can ask: what's the total result on trades flagged "not in plan"? On the ones flagged "making it back"? Those numbers show exactly what each behavior costs you β and past that point discipline stops being a preference and becomes obvious arithmetic.
In Syntra the pre-trade check lives inside the trade form: enter a symbol and direction, and the system evaluates it against your active rules, the day's loss state and your recent trade behavior, returning GO / CAUTION / STOP. The verdict is stored, so it can be analyzed against the outcome later.
Your journal already knows this about you
Syntra logs every trade in R, computes expectancy per setup, and flags the behavior patterns in this article automatically β before the next trade, not after.
Start freeNot financial advice. Trading involves risk of loss.